Saturday, May 10, 2008

SEARCH   



Cattlemen's Beef Promotion
and Research Board

9000 East Nichols Avenue
Suite 215
Centennial, CO 80112

Phone: (303) 220-9890
Fax: (303) 220-9280
beefboard@beefboard.org

Printer-Friendly Version

 

Contacts:         Stephanie Darling   303/850-3359    sdarling@beef.org
                       Diane Henderson    303/867-6302    dhenderson@beefboard.org

                   Does Sex Classification Affect Beef Tenderness?

         Checkoff report looks at pre-harvest heifer management to minimize variances 

CENTENNIAL, Colo. (July 23, 2007) – Tenderness, the gold standard for beef products, is a complex trait influenced by a variety of factors, many of which can be managed to reduce the incidence of tenderness problems in the final product. One inherent tenderness variation often overlooked in pre-harvest management plans, however, is sex classification, according to a new beef checkoff-funded report.  

Young, grain-fed steers and heifers make up 80 percent of cattle processed each year in federally inspected U.S. beef plants. Steers comprise about one-half of the total federally inspected harvest, while heifers represent about 30 percent of the slaughter mix.  

Heifers typically outperform steers in marbling and USDA quality grade, but product tenderness usually favors steers, according to Pre-Harvest Factors Affecting Beef Tenderness in Heifers, a beef checkoff-funded report by Colorado State University meat scientists J.D. Tatum, Ph.D., S.L. Gruber and B.A. Schneider. 

“Beef product tenderness has been determined to be a very important component of consumer satisfaction and, therefore, research that gives the industry information to improve our product’s tenderness will ultimately improve demand for beef,” said Bill Rishel, a Nebraska producer and chairman of the Joint Product Enhancement Research Committee.  

Authors reviewed 10 studies conducted between 1985 and 2006 and compared Warner-Bratzler sheer force (WBSF) values on the major muscle in the rib and loin for both heifers and steers. In eight of the 10 comparisons, the WBSF was significantly higher for heifers than steers. The standardized mean sex effect on muscle WBSF values, computed across all 10 studies, was 0.25. (the lower the WBSF value, the more tender the beef).

Among identified factors that could account for the difference: (1) Differences between heifers and steers in levels of enzymes that break down bovine proteins and “age” beef and (2) The effect of estrogen on heifers, making them generally more excitable and susceptible to pre-harvest stress. Evidence also suggests that intact heifers have higher hormone levels compared to steers and spayed heifers, resulting in tougher beef from the intact animal. Other studies, however, have suggested that spaying has little effect on heifer beef tenderness.

Management techniques include estrus suppression, non-aggressive handling and careful use of finishing implants, if these products are used.

For more information or to view a full report, visit www.beefresearch.org and click on “Product Enhancement Research Executive Summaries” or call the checkoff customer service department, 800-368-3138, to order a copy for $3 on a cost-recovery basis. (Reference item #12812)

______________

The Beef Checkoff Program was established as part of the 1985 Farm Bill. The checkoff assesses $1 per head on the sale of live domestic and imported cattle, in addition to a comparable assessment on imported beef and beef products. States retain up to 50 cents on the dollar and forward the other 50 cents per head to the Cattlemen’s Beef Promotion and Research Board, which administers the national checkoff program, subject to USDA approval.

#          #          #